In Blade Runner , der Fortsetzung des Science-Fiction-Klassikers von Ridley Scott, begibt sich Blade Runner / AT: Blade Runner 2. Blade Runner. Über Filme auf DVD bei Thalia ✓»Blade Runner «und weitere DVD Filme jetzt online bestellen! Villeneuve knüpft in seinem Sequel von "Blade Runner" 30 Jahre nach dessen Handlung an. Er stellt mit Ryan Gosling einen der derzeit angesagtesten Stars in.
Blade Runner 2 Das könnte dich auch interessieren
Im Jahr wird die Produktion von Replikanten, künstlichen Menschen zum Einsatz im Weltall, nach einem langen Verbot wieder erlaubt, als der Industrielle Niander Wallace ein verbessertes Modell vorstellt. Ein lange gehütetes Geheimnis droht ans. Der Film startete am 5. Oktober in den deutschen und am darauffolgenden Tag in den US-Kinos. Inhaltsverzeichnis. 1 Handlung; 2 Themen und Motive. Blade Runner 2 steht für: Blade Runner II, Roman von K. W. Jeter (); Blade Runner , Film von Denis Villeneuve (); Die Entscheidung – Blade. angelsfromhell.eu - Kaufen Sie DIE ENTSCHEIDUNG - Blade Runner 2 günstig ein. Qualifizierte Bestellungen werden kostenlos geliefert. Sie finden Rezensionen und. Darum war ich auch nicht sonderlich scharf auf ein Sequel, hab aber versucht es mir trotzdem zu geben. Und komme geradezu zweigeteilt heraus: was meine. Blade Runner 2: Sci-Fi von Alles über den Film erfahren. Villeneuve knüpft in seinem Sequel von "Blade Runner" 30 Jahre nach dessen Handlung an. Er stellt mit Ryan Gosling einen der derzeit angesagtesten Stars in.
Villeneuve knüpft in seinem Sequel von "Blade Runner" 30 Jahre nach dessen Handlung an. Er stellt mit Ryan Gosling einen der derzeit angesagtesten Stars in. In Blade Runner spielt Ryan Gosling den LAPD Officer K, der eine bringt der frankokanadische Regisseur ein Sequel in die Kinos, das den Faden des. Im Jahr wird die Produktion von Replikanten, künstlichen Menschen zum Einsatz im Weltall, nach einem langen Verbot wieder erlaubt, als der Industrielle Niander Wallace ein verbessertes Modell vorstellt. Ein lange gehütetes Geheimnis droht ans.
Did K request the hologram like this? Did K programme the hologram himself? Also full blown gigantic neon advertisements can interact with you which seems kinda pointless.
I did like how they advanced the technology from the point of view of the original movie. In other words this films future tech is based and advanced on from the future tech of the film, not our reality based future.
Hence plenty of analog tech and Atari are apparently still a big company. The whole police protocol baseline test that K must undergo in order to remain He seemingly undergoes this everyday I think, at the end of his shift.
Its quite clear that K has been taking and passing this test for quite some time and is a solid blade runner.
Yet at one point he fails the test and is immediately branded rogue. By this point I would of thought failing the test wouldn't be that big of a deal.
I just don't see how it would be a major problem anymore, in the early days maybe but now? Also K stages Deckard's death at the end, intending to claim that Deckard drowned in the crashed spinner or whatever flying car that was.
But how does that work?? Surely anyone could quite easily find the crashed vehicle reasonably quickly especially a man like Wallace and discover no body.
With all the tech in this world I'm sure Deckard would get found out soon enough ahem Niander Wallace and Luv: I can't deny that Leto fit the bill here perfectly with his smooth baby-faced looks.
But I can't help but think that both Wallace and his brutal assistant Luv were slightly generic. Wallace is a highly perceptive, intelligent, calm, and softly spoken man.
He is blind but we do not know if he was born this way or not I originally thought he was a replicant. He also has a sadistic streak about him and a clear God complex as he refers to himself as a father to all of his replicant creations.
He really did come across to me as your typical 80's kimono wearing bad guy who dwells in his large lair sending out cronies to do his dirty work.
That leads us to Luv who is Wallace's female replicant enforcer. And that's all you need to know really.
She's your typical menacing, equally sadistic enforcer type who knows martial arts, meh. Its worth noting that in this sequel the replicants do not appear to have the noticeable shine in their eyes anymore.
I put that down to the obvious evolution of replicants, the slow blurring of both human and replicant. Well that plus the whole managing to give birth thing also.
Overall the lack of a proper score throughout this film is but one issue I had in a string of issues that all led me to one real conclusion. What is the actual purpose of this film?
I'm a solid fan of the original Ridley Scott masterpiece. Back in the days of yore the 80's when I was young I didn't really like or appreciate it.
Later in life I have since grown to understand the film, I like but not love it. But I have never really thought the film required anything more, and that's the problem on top of the fact this franchise is highly divisive which was proven at the box office.
If you didn't like the first film This new feature doesn't really feel like it needed. Yes the visuals are inevitably lavish and opulent, yes the acting is solid on the whole, and yes the package overall is well put together kudos.
But the story just felt kinda dull, not really important, not really required. There is little action which was to be expected, but also no real moments to make the hairs on the back of your neck stand up.
Nothing that rouses your emotions and adrenaline. Nothing that almost brings you to the brink of tears The original movie is fine as a stand alone film.
It offers intrigue that doesn't require a bow on top, it doesn't really need anything further. This just felt like a sequel for the sake of having a sequel.
As though they did it merely because they could, because Ford is still alive, because they could basically remake the original with better visuals.
That's essentially how this came across to me. And despite being a good science-fiction film, it still can't touch the original.
Phil H Super Reviewer. Jan 29, We now find ourselves in an age where the filmmaking craft is so preoccupied with making money that it hinders the art form itself and saturates the market with crowd-pleasing dross.
The rise of the superhero blockbuster has played a huge part in this and, as result, the creative and artistic nature of Blade Runner has become a casualty.
Like Ridley Scott's film before it, it has proven to be a box-office failure and despite the desire to provide sequels, the masses simply weren't interested in this one.
But took the sequel to a whole new level. They weren't just money-spinning exercises but revisits to much loved cult classics that were intent on exploring their characters in a whole new depth: 20 years after the drug-addled exploits of Trainspotting, Danny Boyle brought a satisfying maturity to T2 while, 25 years later, David Lynch revisited the quaint logging town of Twin Peaks with The Return - a deeply surreal 18 episodes that has reinvented the way that television can be viewed.
Going even further back than that, Denis Villenueve revisits Blade Runner after a 35 year hiatus and relieves my nervous disposition with the impressive completion of a hat-trick.
A lot of credit must be given to director Denis Villenueve for taking on one of the biggest gambles in filmmaking history. To take on the unenviable task of delivering a sequel to the Ridley Scott classic, Blade Runner, shows real, self-assured confidence.
Villenueve took the task on simply because he thought he could do a serviceable job while fans of the original myself included had strong reservations about a sequel even happening in the first place.
As is always the case, however, the proof is in the end result and I couldn't be more happy that Villenueve has been vindicated. His vision of Blade Runner both expands upon its predecessor while also complimenting it's narrative depth and ethereal beauty.
Villenueve's decision to open on a close-up shot of an iris is an obvious choice - with perhaps the only thing missing being a referential wink to the audience.
Within seconds he goes on to depict an expansive, genetic farming land that's as desolate as it foreboding and already the opening "Hades Landscape" of the original springs to mind as Hans Zimmer creatively riffs on the iconic Vangelis score and manages that fine balance of reminiscence and originality.
From here on, it's clear that we're back on Blade Runner territory and I'd be lying if I didn't say it felt good.
There are many subtle references to the original throughout the entirety of the film but Villenueve is clever enough to make this film his own without succumbing to a pastiche.
His deliberate pace will ostracise many viewers but it's entirely in keeping with the films meditative themes and allows cinematographer Roger Deakins the luxury of immersing us in this dystopian, retro-future with an abundance of gorgeous imagery.
There's not a single frame wasted as Deakins delivers one of the most beautiful pieces of work ever committed to the screen. This visual genius has been nominated for an Oscar 13 times and he's lost every time.
If there's any justice at all, he should win on his 14th attempt with this. This truly is a remarkable artistic achievement. Such is the visual mastery, you could be forgiven for getting lost in Deakins' sumptuous scenery and miss key elements to the plot but Villenueve, or more particularly screenwriters Hampton Fancher and Michael Green, explain things in relative layman's terms.
It's not difficult to follow but sometimes can border on cliche and convenience. I didn't fully buy into some plot developments but the questions left from Deckard's past were, somewhat, unavoidable and this film provides some answers which slightly take away from the original's ambiguity.
That said, it's an unavoidable line that had to be crossed and it's afforded a lot of care and respect. Although, the narrative is fairly simple the similar weighty existential and metaphysical themes are prevalent again.
Where the first film explored the nature of existence, takes it slighter further and ruminates in what it constutes to have a soul and if you're looking for a reliable lead that can convey such world-weariness then look no further than Ryan Gosling.
Gosling has fast become a physical master of minimalism and, as he has already proven in Drive or Only God Forgives for example, he can convey internal struggle by practically doing nothing - which makes him absolutely perfect casting here and apparently the first and only choice that Villenueve had in mind.
He shoulders a lot of the philosophical weight of the film and holds things together when the pace is lesuirely and there's the overhanging and overbearing 1 hour 40 minute wait for Deckard to even appear onscreen.
It's a wait that's worth it though, as it kicks the film into another gear and brings with it Harrison Ford's best performance in years.
There's also more than able support from Ana de Armas as a complex hologram that longs for emotional connection and a megalomaniac Jared Leto with delusions of godliness.
In other words, Blade Runner is a remarkable refurbishment and a genuinely astounding spectacle that manages to hit the beats of the original and still find its own rhythm.
Some critics have have went as far to claim that this is an improvement over the original. Although I wouldn't go as far as that, this is still a magnificent continuation of the mythos.
The only sour note is that it descends into slightly generic action material towards the end which jars with the deliberate and meditative tone that preceded it.
That said, it manages to turn this around and when credits rolled, I found myself in contemplative silence, exhilarated by what I had just witnessed.
Sequels that can achieve such a balance and expansion on their much loved predecessors are a rarity and, as a result, can take a bow and is fully deserving of a rapturous applause.
Villenueve has only gone and made things we fans couldn't believe - a worthy sequel on the shoulders of a giant. Mark Walker. Mark W Super Reviewer.
See all Audience reviews. There are no approved quotes yet for this movie. Best Horror Movies. Worst Superhero Movies. Best Netflix Series and Shows.
Go back. More trailers. We Are Who We Are. Filthy Rich. No Score Yet. Dancing With the Stars. The Voice. The Good Doctor. Technical Specs.
Plot Summary. Plot Keywords. Parents Guide. External Sites. User Reviews. User Ratings. External Reviews. Metacritic Reviews. Photo Gallery.
Trailers and Videos. Crazy Credits. Alternate Versions. Rate This. Young Blade Runner K's discovery of a long-buried secret leads him to track down former Blade Runner Rick Deckard, who's been missing for thirty years.
Director: Denis Villeneuve. Added to Watchlist. From metacritic. Visions of the Future in Movies and TV. Sci-Fi drama,action,mystery.
Watched in Favourite Movies. Use the HTML below. You must be a registered user to use the IMDb rating plugin. Won 2 Oscars.
Edit Cast Cast overview, first billed only: Ryan Gosling Sapper Morton Robin Wright Lieutenant Joshi Mark Arnold Format production -. Couleur Couleur.
Format audio -. Format de projection -. En VOD. Blade Runner Bande-annonce VF. Blade Runner Bande-annonce 2 VO. Blade Runner Bande-annonce 3 VO.
Blade Runner Bande-annonce 4 VO. Blade Runner Bande-annonce 4 VF. Blade Runner Bande-annonce VO. Interviews, making-of et extraits.
Acteurs et actrices. Ryan Gosling. Harrison Ford.Yes the visuals are inevitably lavish and opulent, yes the acting is solid on the whole, and yes the package overall is well put together kudos. The reason Blade Runner will be remembered, just like its Der Fluch 2, is for its visuals. Vaiana Serien Stream Artikel Diskussion. I didn't fully buy into some plot developments but the questions left from Deckard's Filme Deutsch Ganze L�Nge were, somewhat, unavoidable and this film provides some answers which slightly take away from the original's ambiguity. Parents Guide. Archived from the Rebekka Mir on January 3, If Gaff knew about that, it's Gaff's message to say, Saber Deutsch read Eotik file, mate. There's not a single frame wasted as Deakins delivers one of the most beautiful pieces of work ever committed to the screen. New York Post.